This website and court proceedings that dealt with the associated case have throughout, been in response to denial of contact between a father and his son. That reason has been given for all applications made to the courts and also clearly indicated on this web-site from the start.
Riding a crest of accusations, blame and criticism, a pretence that dad tried to gain custody on grounds of mum's incompetence was presented. In truth the issue is defence of a child's right to spend quality time with both parents and to deflate the disturbing denigration and exclusion of his father.
twisted writhing venomous forked tongues defeated |
In our forgiveness an opponent is confronted, not with retribution, but with the shame of her own aggression. Forgiving is, however, not the same as forgetting. The pen becomes mightier than the sword by exposing the swordsman's purpose. Medusa succumbs only on recognition of her own hideous reflection. |
In peaceful protest, the author of this site is prepared to publicly reveal negligence, deception and hypocrisy. Let then the perpetrator's own conscience triumph. Truth without malice, transcends legal jurisdiction on humanitarian grounds. Denial, suppression and falsehood can offer no protection for the innocent! |
| Defenders of Britain once displayed their archery fingers to a hostile invader in a gesture of defiance. This is an appropriate response to those unethical professionals in authority who profit by devastating families and traumatising their children, who carry on their rackets cloaked in anonymity and seek refuge in perversions of the law. When one's right cheek has offended, should a man retreat, retaliate, or valiantly offer another cheek and so stay true to the beliefs he holds? |
|---|